Open Protocols
Sociotechnical knowledge sets that circulate freely through the social field, crystallizing before diverse publics into maximally versatile and practical forms. Open protocols have two defining features: memeticism (they actively encourage reproduction and divergent application) and open-ended empiricism (they are continuously revised according to practical outcomes, resistant to ideology or institutional capture). They stand in contrast to institutional protocols, which are anti-memetic (classified, branded, proprietary) and anti-empirical (resistant to inconvenient truths that threaten institutional stability).
Open protocols are not merely technical standards; they carry cultural values of consent, high agency, and participatory aesthetics. Because they must discourage enclosure and centralization in order to persist, they are inherently anti-institutional in character. They are “finely tuned, concretized cognitive assets — the genius of the publics.” (— attemptatdefinitions) Examples span centuries: LSD distribution ethics, S&M safety practices, free party logistics, urban gardening techniques, and the open-source software movement.
In the web3 context, open protocols represent the structural homology between the informal extitutional undergrounds of city culture and the permissionless open-source culture of Ethereum — both defined by memeticism, empiricism, and anticapture.
Related Research
- attemptatdefinitions
- Sketches Toward a Theory of the Protocol Underground
- What is Ethereum Localism
- Speculative P2P and the Urban Protocol Underground
- 2026 the rise of the protocol
- Undercapital Redux
- ETHEREUM IS POSTHUMAN
- Capitalism, Communism, and the Extitutional Stakes of Our Politics
- We Are the Neotechnics